I don't think it does.
I need to get to the very bottom.
Cellular automaton is fine as an idea, but it does NOT explain how cellular automaton idea has become a cellular automaton idea anyway. I mean, it has this ontological or episthemological weakness, I don't know which one, choose yourself, I don't really care for this onto/epist FLOWER.
There's this singularity metaphysical notion, right? So, if it's truly metaphysical, it has no direction, no goals, no weight, no measure, no distance to drive from A to B, no language, no musical wave to follow, no physics laws, no religion laws.
And all of once, it just explodes into diversity.
I mean, both notions of singularity and diversity are fine, but how does singularity turn into diversity?
Zyx, I don't believe you never ever thought of a relativity particle, just as a mind exercise.
Had your computer crash on you, or a website shows wrong, or your printer went dead on you? Come on in...